3 The model of displaying atoms keeps changing and so does chemistry. One might argue that chemistry is not always on the move, because it takes place when a researcher finds an anomaly and he is aware. Only then he will search for a possible explanation. If this anomaly can not be explained by the current paradigm, he has to come up with a new theory. Until the whole community is dissatisfied with the current paradigm, a crisis emerges, and new paradigm will be accepted. 4 This shows that history just moves in times of crisis.
The, theory of, knowledge, essay examples - 1043 Palabras
One might say that history is not always on the move, it just reiterates. Scientist observe nature and try to explain what they see with the help of theories. The nature itself does not change, but the way they look at it is different. A paradigm is the idea of a prevailing theory or model, which is commonly accepted by a whole community. When a scientific revolution takes place, the paradigm changes, essay and with the paradigm all basic concepts of the science. If we look at paradigm changes of atomic models through time, we see that Dalton (1807) displayed atoms as a solid, indivisible ultimate particles of matter. We will write a custom essay sample. Theory of Knowledge or any similar topic only for you. Order now, in 1898 Thompson imagined an atom to be like plum Pudding. Rutherford (1911) presented the Planetary model, which shows electrons in finite orbits. In the present model, we imagine the electrons in orbitals having precise energies and diffuse spacial properties, often referred to as electron clouds.
In the year 2005 a bosnian archaeologist called Semir Osmanagic suspects there are pyramids in his homeland Bosnia and Herzegovina. Anthropologists say the visoko valley already offers ample evidence of organized human settlements dating back 7000 years. 1 This discovery would change the entire european history. Something that was commonly accepted, that the first pyramids came from Egypt, has altered completely. Thus history is moving. A counter argument to this could be that history just repeats itself and does not move at all. The renaissance is a repetition of the Classical times, in which the work of ancient scholars was studied again. Painting, sculpture and architecture were influenced by the latin and Greek culture, so that paintings became more realistic and focused less often on religious topics. 2 Furthermore, the name rebirth was not given for nothing, it guaranteed was a repetition.
discuss the extent to which this claim applies to history and at least one other area of knowledge. In order to find out if the claim applies to the areas of knowledge history and chemistry i will break the question down in three parts. Firstly i ask if history and chemistry move. Secondly i question if it erodes todays orthodoxy and finally i consider if yesterdays heresy takes over. In my opinion the claim applies to some extent to history and to a great extent to chemistry. Are history and chemistry always on the move? Moves in history can have various causes: the discovery of new facts, a different focus of interest or a political shift.
Ib theory of knowledge essay - top, essay
The problem with the hot stove scenario is that it is a purely physical pain or a physical emotion, which bridge understandably will cause a reaction. 4, ira birkkjaer Theory of Knowledge Essay regarding a negative psychological emotion, it is ambivalent to which extent this in any given situation will encourage knowledge or instead be an obstacle to knowledge. I know from my own mathematical experience, that if there is something I feel a strong dislike for it will often be imprinted in my brain and continue to exist as knowledge, even if as something negative. Meanwhile, if there is an aspect of mathematics, which I do not feel a particular hatred for but that certainly does not evoke a positive emotion either, that is, there is only a vague emotion; it will not benefit me as a guide to further. Essentially emotion, whether negative or positive, is the energy required to learn anything. Iv without emotion, knowledge passes us by unrecognized.
Biography 5, ira birkkjaer Theory of Knowledge Essay cathcart, Thomas, and Daniel Klein. Plato and a platypus Walk into a bar. London: Penguin books, 2008. New York: Broadway books, 2006. Endnotes 6 i, rapaille, clotaire. Samuel taylor Coleridge iii georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, iv rapaille, clotaire. History is always on the move, slowly eroding todays orthodoxy and making space for yesterdays heresy.
That is not to say that art does not require any technical abilities but that even these, as the law of cosine in mathematics, are learned on the basis of interest, that is, emotion. The arts though, to the very core, are inspired or generated by an emotion and in most cases produce an emotion as well - may it be classical music, an abstract painting or African dance, it evokes an emotion; causes a reaction. But within art does the emotion provoked by the art guide knowledge? The arts in a sense take the idea, or statement, that There can be no knowledge without emotionuntil we have felt the force of the knowledge, it is not ours full circle. The energy initiating the art so to speak is an emotion, and as long as there is a fundamental passion for art present, it does not matter whether this emotion portrayed is positive or negative since art can express both powerfully.
Then the production of the initial emotion evokes emotion, which then creates the pathway to emotional knowledge. My artwork is always reflective of or relating to myself, therefore essentially emotional. Each individual in the audience will experience my piece differently as it will evoke a like or a dislike, which then allows him or her to understand either something about me and the reasons behind the work or emotion in general, that is, emotional knowledge. Emotion, no matter within what area of knowledge or in what form: negative or positive seems to be the generation of all knowledge. Naturally a positive emotion can lead to a higher level of knowledge since positive emotions stimulate interest and as the german philosopher georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel said, nothing great is accomplished in the world without passion. Iii my passion is the visual and literary arts and it also in these areas that I have developed the greatest knowledge, which has led me further to greater accomplishments than within any other area of knowledge. It can thereby be deduced that a positive emotion will always be a stronger pathway to knowledge, as interest produced by a positive emotion enhances the knowers desire for further information. While not as strongly, it is wrong to say that a negative emotion does not provide a pathway to knowledge. An example of this is the child, who puts his or her hand on the hot stove and becomes subject to pain, whereby the child learns not to repeat such an act.
How to Write a, theory of, knowledge (tok essay
From day to day, in our mundane routines, we to some extent act as the therapist or daddy psychologist of the people with whom we interact whether it be friends, family or coworkers. The hallway of a summary high school in between classes is a true example of this. Based upon personal experience i know that a good friend is someone who will listen to me, try to understand my emotional situation and seek to advise. Yet in the end I mostly disregard this advice because of the clichés: they do not really know what I feel or they do not actually understand. And how can they? If emotion, whether positive or negative, is necessary for the existence of knowledge, then one would think that a friend or family member would essentially be more capable of helping as there is a likelihood that they 3, ira birkkjaer Theory of Knowledge Essay are. Concerning art as an area of knowledge, it is generally accepted that all knowledge within the subject is based upon the presence of emotions.
Here the question is it possible to stay government emotionally neutral in an ethical situation, that is, will not ethical knowledge always be subject to emotion? It has been argued that the core, the foundation of ethical decision-making, moral judgment was hardwired into us, which suggests that within ethics one cannot have any knowledge objective of emotion. The human sciences exist and evolve due to emotion. The areas, psychology, economics and anthropology are designed to investigate, develop, calculate and conclude regarding emotion as a way of knowing. Essentially though, these methods focus largely on language, reason and perception while emotion is the vital way of knowing at hand. If emotion is required to know anything, if deep thinking is attainable only by a man of deep emotion, ii then to become a specialist in the field of psychology and truly be capable of helping or curing a patient, one would need to have. This may be the reason why many psychotic diseases are said to be never fully healed simply because there is no other person who has felt exactly the same feelings as the patient, and therefore none with the knowledge allowing them to help to the.
2005, a danish cartoonist, kurt Westergaard, working for the national newspaper, jyllands Posten, published a series of caricatures of the prophet Mohammed. The reaction to follow was to an international student, predictable; Muslims worldwide protested in defense of their religion, burning the danish flag and images of the cartoonist himself as well as Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the prime minister of Denmark at the time. This divergence was and is an ethical. Ira birkkjaer Theory of Knowledge Essay conflict between two religious cultures and their individual sets of knowledge - a knowledge issue, difficult to solve due to the emotional impact that is has. The individuals perception of the situation and their ability to reason is distracted due to emotion, and in addition to that there is a language barrier separating the two cultures. The underlying knowledge of the muslim as well as the danish culture, was guided by the emotional circumstances of the conflict. In a conflict as such, the knowledge which provides the culture its foundation for its reasoning is no longer sustainable. Emotion, based on cultural and religious traditions, dominates the situation, to the extend where none of the players can know anything- has any knowledge, objective to their emotional basis.
The questions remains Was Rapaille correct in his proclamation; can there be any knowledge without the application of emotion? If emotion exists as the only pathway to knowledge then it seems rather comical that have i spent thirteen years of my life in an educational system, which forces knowledge upon me that does not necessarily stimulate positive emotions. The artistic areas of knowledge, particularly languages and the visual arts, have always been my favorite and less surprisingly also the areas within which my strengths lie. Meanwhile, i have dragged myself through several natural science and mathematic classes. These areas never caused me much joy; emotions likely affected by my lacking interest in the areas. Yet again, if emotion is the energy required to learn anything then my negative emotions towards the natural sciences and mathematics should still trigger, support, and encourage the growth of knowledge within the subject, since owl a negative emotion is as valuable an emotion. Is a positive emotion, more specifically, the energy required to learn anything? Each area of knowledge defines and applies the term knowledge differently, each taking certain qualities of knowledge for granted. In ethics knowledge becomes a vague term resting on culture, previous experience or childhood, and possibly the religion of the individual.
Theory of knowledge essay - custom Paper Writing Help
Please download to view, word count: 1528, a theory of Knowledge Essay. There can be no knowledge without emotionuntil we have felt the force of the knowledge, it is not ours (adapted from Arnold Bennett). Discuss this vision of the relationship between knowledge and golf emotion. Ira birkkjaer, ira birkkjaer Theory of Knowledge Essay. Emotion is the energy required to learn anything, i said Clotaire rapaille, the author of The culture code. Rapaille is the godfather of Archetype Studies and Creativity, asking the question Why do people do what they do? And he is well known for his unique approach to market research based on his knowledge of psychology, psychiatry and cultural anthropology.