So how can I say its all his fault, when its not really all his fault? She paused for a long breath, i mean, eventually she would have anyway. It just so happened to be the timing with the article. Jordan was a partner in Yar Golf and had dated Vanderbilt for five years. Vanderbilt committed suicide in her bedroom. Related: The rise and Fall of Caleb Hannans Grantland Story.
Write good introduction paragraph english essay how
If that is oversensitivity, then so be it; I think there should be more sensitivity. We have witnessed what good happened when the folks at Grantland, particularly caleb Hannan and Bill Simmons, lacked that sensitivity. And its not because they havent been called on to exhibit it before. Thats why i, and many people like me, have called for more diversity in the media — its not just because we want to see more people like us represented. We want other people to see us the way we see ourselves: as real people. Bill Simmons, caleb Hannan, essay anne vanderbilt autobiographies Grantland. Essay anne vanderbilts ex-girlfriend and business partner Gerri jordan blamed fear about the Grantland article for 90 percent of the timing of her suicide in October. Jordan did not blame the author, caleb Hannan, for the suicide itself, noting multiple past attempts and a history of depression. But she believes the article was a factor in when it happened. I dont hold any grudge, really, since shes tried it before, jordan said as her eyes filled with tears that did not spill over.
Why does everyone have to be so politically correct? Its an easy and lazy way of distracting from the real problem: a lack of empathy for those who in diary many situations lack a voice, who are swiftly shut down by a status quo that tells us, over and over again, that we are. I do not kid myself that Bill Simmons has been reading the things ive been writing on Flavorwire. And, lets be honest, writing about Jared Letos Golden Globes speech isnt changing the world. It may not even change anyones mind. But I do hope that when people express their anger over the art and media we consume — art and media created by those who are living what is seen as the default experience, and can be harmful to marginalized people — their criticisms are. I want there to be a conversation about how people — human beings — are portrayed across the media.
Michael douglas recounted a story in which he worried that he was mincing on the set. Traffic when his future, behind the candelabra director Steven Soderbergh asked him if he ever thought about Liberace. I wrote the piece not because i found what the pair of actors expressed to be personally hurtful. If anything, i rolled my eyes at what were lame attempts at gay jokes. But I did see other people express their heartfelt disdain for it, which is why i tried my best to articulate why i found it obnoxious that two actors focused on the physical or stereotypical aspects of their characters in their speeches rather than those. While a lot of people online had positive things to say about the piece, there an equal number, per usual, responded by saying I was too sensitive and was creating outrage. This is the typical response i get whenever I (or anyone else i know) write about identity politics: youre being too sensitive. Youre thinking about it too much.
American Indian Thought: Philosophical Essays: Anne waters
Well, because kate bornstein is a good writer, and an important one, and one who is brilliant enough to pdf inspire empathy and introspection in a diverse audience of readers — not just other trans people. And because at least 13 to 15 senior Grantland staff members — relatively young people, if Simmons suggestion that hes the sarah fourth-oldest person writing for Grantland is true — know next to nothing about the trans community or the trans experience. It shows how homogenous the editorial team really is, and the importance of diversity in the media. It shows the importance of depicting a variety of experiences and identities, both in the news media and in entertainment. And it shows the importance of what is a foundation of good reporting: asking questions. But no one bothered to ask the questions that mattered; instead, they were satisfied with assuming they knew the facts until it proved otherwise. Until someone was hurt.
Until a lesson needed to be learned. Last Monday, a few day before the. V story was published, I wrote a piece about a few acceptance speeches at the golden Globes. In it, i suggested that it was rather disheartening to see two major male actors in Hollywood — jared Leto and Michael douglas — accept awards for playing characters who had drastically different experiences from their own. Leto, playing a transgender woman afflicted with aids. Dallas buyers Club, cracked jokes about all of the body waxing he had to undergo for the part.
How does the viewer process this information and, in turn, apply it to the way they see trans people in the real world? Thats the central problem here, one that is reflected in the fact that the structure of Hannans story reflects so many harmful fictional narratives about trans women that are common in our culture. It may well explain why no one saw a problem with the piece, even though, as Bill Simmons mentioned in his apology, between 13 and 15 people read the piece in all, including every senior editor but one, our two lead copy desk editors, our. Simmons goes on to admit, we werent educated, we failed to ask the right questions, we made mistakes, and were going to learn from them. Its easy to say that.
Its easy to claim after youve already made a disastrous mistake that you want to learn about the transgender community, or any other marginalized community, for that matter. The important thing, however, is that there needs to be a desire to do so — one that isnt a result of a massive backlash. Its not like there havent been opportunities for members of the Grantland staff to educate themselves about the lives, struggles, and politics of trans people. (Hell, they ran a feature about Against Me! Front woman laura jane Grace the day before the. V story.) There are plenty of books on the subject, particularly very good ones written by people who have firsthand experience as members of the community. Those kinds of books, however, are too often ghettoized, their target audience not unlike the authors themselves. After all, why would it occur to anyone on the Grantland staff to read anything, for example, by kate bornstein, whose. Gender Outlaw is a pioneering study about living as a transgender individual?
College admissions in the United States - wikipedia
Soapdish, im increasingly hesitant to recommend it because the golf climax is based on the revelation that Montana moorehead — the buxom, oversexed, conniving soap opera star who will stop at nothing to destroy her costars emotionally and professionally — was once milton moorehead. This is the perfect narrative device to make literal the subtext of the character that screenwriter Robert Harling envisioned: this woman isnt a woman at all. Shes a crook, a liar, corrupt, and evil. She deserves what comes to her in the end, doesnt she? Maybe harling didnt intend that to be the message. But, any way you look at it, he made a choice in making Montana moorehead a trans character. Its worth delving into: he did this on purpose, and applied this specific identity and experience to the films villain.
sensitivity to and interest in those whose lives and identities are different from their own. In his apology, simmons admits that the Grantland editorial team just didnt have much of an understanding of the transgender experience; none of them, after all, are trans, and none of them likely know many trans individuals who might have influenced them to learn these. What they have experienced, however, is how the trans experience is presented to them in the media — in film, on tv, and in pieces like the. Often — too often — trans individuals are depicted in entertainment as frauds and villains. Sure, dallas buyers Club s rayon is an example of a sympathetic trans character, but I can think of many more popular characters that are not. The ones that quickly come to mind: sean youngs revenge-seeking former football player. Ace ventura: Pet Detective ; jaye davidsons Dil in, the Crying Game, whose personal revelations drive her boyfriend into a panic (in a role that incited many transphobic parodies and Cathy moriartys Montana moorehead. Soapdish, as lovingly campy a movie you can find (and one i personally love). But no matter how much I love.
But because vanderbilt was extraordinary, her gender identity was apparently open for scrutiny alongside her dubious professional life. Which is a shame, when you think about it, because we dont entry assume that Hannans experience as a straight man sheds light on his writing career, do we? (That is, if youre wondering, a rhetorical question.) Is posing questions about Hannans genitals important to understanding who he is as a writer? All of the criticism of the. V piece would have likely lasted about 72 hours (the typical length of online outrage if a central component to the story wasnt Vanderbilts suicide, which by all accounts probably took place because she feared she would be outed as transgender in an industry that. Following a weekend of criticism aimed at Grantland, the site ran two response pieces. In one, writer Christina kahrl, herself a trans woman who writes about sports, discusses what the editorial team got wrong and how she would have done things differently had she been involved in editing the story. In the second, Grantland founder Bill Simmons offers a lengthy apology, ultimately blaming himself for allowing the piece to run on the site.
List of college and university student newspapers in the
Last Wednesday, grantland published the now-infamous. In it, writer Caleb Hannan seeks to find out about the titular inventor of this golf club, a woman whose full apple name is Essay anne vanderbilt. Throughout his investigation and reporting, he discovers that shes not who she said she was. She does not hold the degrees she claims to have. Theres little record of her personal history. Like the plot of a criminal procedural, hannan writes of the biggest twist, which sent a chill running down his spine: Essay anne vanderbilt was born a man, her whole life, apparently, a lie. That Vanderbilts identity as a transgender woman made her as much of a fraud as her claims about her professional experience is possibly not the point Hannan intended to make. Yet the two are intertwined, because had Vanderbilt been born a woman, this strange twist would not have been anything out of the ordinary.